Whisper World and other acts of community

With the return of in-person learning, this school year has presented me with plenty of challenges. One of the biggest has been building community. After being away for so long, helping students identify with and feel connected to the classroom again is important work.

As the first semester ends, I want to reflect on some of the ways I’ve welcomed students back and worked to rebuild a classroom community. Instructional routines have contributed, but most of my community-building has non-academic roots. Some of my approaches are playful and unplanned. Others are more intentional and thought out. Methodologies or origins aside, the end goal is to humanize the classroom and foster a sense of belonging and connectedness for everyone — myself included. They make teaching and learning sustainable during these erratic times.

First, there are my rocks, my essentials. These are the routines I’ve relied on year after year. I don’t see myself doing away with them anytime soon.

  • Friday Letters. The top dawg. I’ve been receiving and writing letters to students for 8 years now. More than just checking in, we co-author stories, explore new languages, play games, and do just about everything else through our weekly letters.
  • Token of appreciation. This is a warm-hearted routine that gets better as the school year passes. Staff at my school even have a token now. We pass it at every faculty meeting.
  • Burn Five Minutes. A daily routine that I cherish. I never quite know where it’ll take us until we arrive there — and this is precisely why I love it. It’s our window to worlds both inner and outer.
  • Co-generative Dialogues. Critical conversations with students that directly impact how our classroom functions. They position me as a learner from my students and are a highlight of my week, every week.
  • Handshakes. A new favorite. So far this year I’ve created 30 distinct handshakes with 28 different students. We’re now performing them mostly contactless due to Covid, but the camaraderie that comes along with them never fades.

My other community builders are unique to this school year and even unique to a particular class period. There’s no way I could capture them all here, as so many small moments chip in and do their part — but here are a few standouts. They’re mostly the result of an unexpected or random moment that I picked up and followed into the unknown. Localized and reflections the relations I have with my students, they may not exist beyond this year (or even next month) because my classes will no doubt evolve and find new ways of bonding.

  • Whisper World. Whisper world is a fictional place that my 7th period class travels to whenever there is noticeable silence in the room. In whisper world, whispers are the only way we are allowed to speak to one another. It’s silly and funny and was born one random day when I realized that it was so quiet in the class that I could whisper my direct instruction. I whispered for the rest of the class and we got a kick out of it. A couple weeks later it happened again. It was so unique and different that I formalized it with a name. Now, anytime it gets unusally quiet, I’ll whisper something and the class knows exactly where we’re headed. Whisper World!
  • Fruit Names. Back on Friday, January 7, New York City was hit with a fast-moving snowstorm. In my ninth period that day, I had a staggering 4 kids in my class (normally there’s around 20). Feeling urge to spend class time differently, instead of doing math, I asked: Which fruit best represents you and why? I heard all sorts of interesting things that day, but the best part happened the next day when we decided that the fruit we chose would become our official “Fruit Name.” For the kids who weren’t present for the original talk, we spent a few minutes on Monday choosing their fruits. In our class, each person’s Fruit Name is interchangeable with their real name. We have a Coconut, Banana, Mango 1, Mango 2, Papaya, Apple, Pear, and plenty of others. A visiting colleague even played along and made his name Acorn. Ha!
  • Post-it wall. Back in November, a student in my fifth period class wrote “Write how you feel” on a small whiteboard and passed it around the room during the lesson. It was unplanned, unsolicitated, and completely warmed my heart. I spoke to her after class and we decided to turn it into a daily routine. Every day (or almost every day) she writes a question on a Post-it note and passes it around the room while we’re working. The questions range simple (What is your favorite show?) to heavy (What is your biggest fear?) to optimistic (What’s somthing you’re good at?) and they’re different each day. After we all respond, she sticks it on a wall we dedicated to the Post-its. The collection is growing by the day — it’s wonderful.
  • Gotta Catch it.” (This one has no real name yet.) This is my latest antic and perhaps the most fun. It involves me saying someone’s name at random during class and then throwing a Kooshball at them (they have to catch it). It’s mainly just random people at random times, but I am strategic at times too. It’s kind of like when someone throws something at you and says, “Think fast!” I do it a few times per class, if I remember. It has turned into a fun challenge. Some classes have started a +/- system where we count how many catches/drops we have throughout the week.
  • Math penpals. Covid has prevented this charming idea from becoming a routine, but it’s special because the community it fosters extends beyond our classroom. Our hand-written letters bound us to another math class that is halfway across the country. The excitement of writing and receiving our math-themed letters is unlike anything I’ve done as a teacher.

bp

Meditations on a Cogen (No. 14) • Thursday, January 27, 2022

During the 2021-22 school year, I’m having weekly co-generative dialogues (or cogens) with my students. In an effort to help me process these talks and document progress, I summarize and write reflections after each cogen. This is the 14th post in the series.

Dividends
With minimal reminders, I had a whopping seven kids today. Two were old heads from the previous cohort who arrived on their own accord. Another was simply hanging out in the room as the cogen was about to start, fascinated as to why several of my students are sitting around a dressed-up table with snacks on a Thursday afternoon. I asked the student if he wanted to join and he happily grabbed a seat. I had another student explain our purpose of the cogen to him before we began.

With a new member joining today on a limb, it’s apparent to me that the cogen is starting to sell itself. Students see its value and trust the space — or at least these students do. The curb appeal also helps. I think my doggedness in meeting every week is paying off.

Choice Quiz
As we begin, I ask the kids about their week. Any midterms? Where have your stress levels been? They reply that they have been pretty chill — most had only one midterm this week. Curious, I do some probing into how their teachers went about reviewing for their midterms. What techniques did they use? Were they effective? One student saw where I was going and asked if I was looking for strategies to use in our class. I was (their chem teacher had an interesting idea that I might try), but added that I also wanted to help them reflect on their week.

The main course today is the Choice Quizzes that I administered this week. Select students in each of my classes were rewarded with these quizzes for achieving the class DeltaMath goal. The Choice Quiz — which I gave twice this week — consists of two problems. The students choose the problem that they want me to grade. It was my first time doing these types of quizzes (usually there’s just one problem that they solve), so I was eager to see how it went for the students. The Choice Quiz was the result of the cogen.

Their first piece of feedback they gave me had nothing to do with the choice aspect of the quiz: there wasn’t enough time to complete it. I administer quizzes at the end of the period and, in all of my classes, the students had to stay after the bell to finish the quiz. Of course, that’s on me. I felt bad about this during class when it happened, and offered to write late passes to any student who needed one.

That said, I didn’t fully consider the ramifications until today’s cogen. Soon after I brought it up, a student said politely, “Mister, I was in the middle of the quiz when the bell rang. I didn’t have enough time to process the question or think how to do it.” Another kid said, “That also happened to me. I heard the bell and my brain just shut down because I had a midterm in the class right after yours. I needed to get there on time so I rushed and made a mistake on the quiz.” And this isn’t a one-time thing because another student commented, “Every time I see a quiz in our class, I hope I have time to finish it. It usually runs over.” In hearing them out, I think about all that I try to fit into a class period and cringe inside. It’s inconsiderate of me to expect them to stay even just a few minutes past the bell.

Acknowledging that my planning needs to be improved, I pivot toward the content of the Choice Quizzes. How did they feel about the options I gave them? Did the quizzes meet their expectations?

I approached each of the two Choice Quizzes slightly differently. On the first (Type 1), the two problems on the quiz aligned with two separate topics that we are studying. On the second quiz (Type 2), the problems both dealt with the same topic. The students noticed this and had a lot to say. Their initial reaction was an appreciation for Type 1 because they could choose the problem that they knew more about (i.e. which one was easier for them). In this way, the students felt like they had actual options. Type 2, on the other hand, didn’t feel like it incorporated choice at all because both problems on it were linked to the same topic (they were very similar and resembled one we did in class that day — like all quiz problems do).

As their teacher, I expressed how giving all Type 1 quizzes can be problematic for me. If students only choose problems on topics they feel comfortable with, how will I ever know what they don’t know about topics they don’t feel confident doing? Type 2 quizzes allow me to target my assessment. They nod at my point but step up and deliver some potential compromises. They pepper the cogen with questions.

Could I hold off on Type 2 quizzes until the end of a unit so that the problems on them can be more diverse? What about mixing in ungraded (feedback) quizzes more often to help me assess what students know and don’t know? I only did one of these and haven’t gone back to it. Since students don’t know the topic that will be on any quiz, they also wondered if I could somehow “emphasize” which topic it will be before the quiz begins? What if I simply found a balance between Type 1 and Type 2 quizzes?

They give me a lot to think about, the most promising being that I should loop in low-stakes quizzes more often (i.e. feedback quizzes). I forgot all about these assessments and the students seem to appreciate them. I’m also thinking about how the balance of Type 1 and Type 2 is a strong idea. Of course, none of this matters if students don’t have time to complete them!

DeltaMath Day
As we head for the hills, I announce to the cogen that we will have our first “DeltaMath Day” next week Friday. Next week is going to be a 3-day week, but I think we can make it happen. They smile, glad to hear the news.

Feedback on the fly + math bingo
On Tuesday something insightful happened with one of the cogen members. He came up to me at the beginning of class and asked whether I could use more worked examples in the Do Now (the problem we start class with). I had been doing this regularly all year but hadn’t used one in a while. He said that he liked them and that they help him understand common mistakes. I thanked him and ended up using a worked example both yesterday and today. In the midst of our discussion today, I brought this up to the cogen as a great example of providing me in-the-moment feedback on what they’re experiencing. In this way, I encouraged them not to wait until Thursday to offer suggestions on what they think can be improved about the class.

Something else: the cogen students’ are running Bingo tomorrow! I’m excited — and a little nervous — to start this next phase of the cogen: co-teaching. Updates next week.

bp

Meditations on a Cogen (No. 13) • Thursday, January 20, 2022

During the 2021-22 school year, I’m having weekly co-generative dialogues (or cogens) with my students. In an effort to help me process these talks and document progress, I summarize and write reflections after each cogen. This is the 13th post in the series.

Hope
Today’s cogen came at the end of the first semester. With grades due, and many of my students struggling to say afloat, my mood these last few days has been somber. I needed this week’s cogen to give me hope.

Yesterday and today I spoke to most of the students and reminded them about today’s session. I was pleasantly surprised when most of them nodded and said they remembered. The result today is solid: five students. This includes one student from the previous cohort who wanted to come back again. There was one new member from 3rd period. Another from period 7 couldn’t make it because of basketball.

There’s one empty seat from 1st period that I need to fill. I have my prospects, including a student who came after school today to take an exam. He walked into the room, saw me setting up our table, and asked, “Mister, what’s this?” I sensed his intrigue and satisfied his curiosity with some playful statement about it being a tablecloth, and then gave him the exam. After he finished, the cogen was long over. I gave him my cogen elevator pitch and he seemed interested.

Post-exam: a surprise and a revision
For the last couple of months, I’ve been asking about specifics of the class that I’ve needed their support on. This week, with mostly new students around the table, I wanted something different. I decide to cast my net out and see what I catch. So, after I oriented our new member to the cogen, I opened by asking simply, how was class the week?

We are studying complex numbers this week and the first four students mention it directly. I’m using Michael Pershan and Max Ray’s geometric approach, like I have for the last few years. The kids like it. They say playing Simon Says in the hallway was fun. I thank them for their praise, but get that feeling again. It’s the annoying feeling that the students — mainly because they’re new — aren’t able to supply ample critiques of what they’re experiencing. To them, as long as the classroom isn’t burning to the ground, everything is “fine.” I can’t blame them for this, however. How often are students asked to be critical of their teacher and then actively heard out?

I figured this might happen, so I wait and listen. I’m ready to pounce on the smallest hint of dissonance that I hear. When the last student shares, I get my chance. Interestingly, she breaks rank with the rest of the group doesn’t mention complex numbers at all. Instead, it’s her performance on the most recent exam that’s weighing on her. She is the most soft-spoken of the group, so I literally have to lean in to hear what she says. I invite her to tell me more and she goes on to ask about my retake policy. Why can’t students merely submit corrections for an exam instead of having to retake it altogether?

Some context in her question: I’ve been allowing students to retake exams — with their new score replacing their original — for a while now. It’s my meager effort to have students’ grades reflect what they actually know about Algebra 2, even if it takes them a little more time to know it. For a lot of reasons, correcting an exam after the fact doesn’t do that for me. Corrections, in my experiences, give an inflated sense of what students know — especially when the student does poorly on an exam. Hence, my policy: any student who scores less than 85% on an exam can retake it without penalty. Before this year, fearing abuse of the policy, I only allowed two retakes per semester. This year, after reading Joe Feldman’s Grading for Equity, I removed my constraint and allowed unlimited retakes to any student scoring below 85%. To be eligible for the retake, students must attend tutoring after school and earn at least 65% on the corresponding DeltaMath assignment.

For the record, students who scored above 85% have no way of showing me they understand more mathematics after an exam; they have no way to improve their grades. I know this is a flawed policy, but my reasoning for it aligned with my sanity: I feared that so many kids would retake that it would be unmanageable. The policy also helped to ensure that my attention would be given to the students who needed me the most. If I had a bunch of students retaking to improve their grade from an 87% to a 95%, for example, that would take away from me helping students who score 53% and are in desperate need of my reteaching.

Anyway, back to the cogen. We discuss these policies and something fascinating happens: the students say that they didn’t know that the retake replaces their original grade. What?! It’s January — how do they not know this? I preach about it after every exam. I’m shocked.

After my astonishment fades, I realize that the student who asked the question about retakes vs. corrections thought that I treated them the same way. I also realized that I need to do a much better job explaining retakes to my students, which I vow to do in front of the cogen today. Some of my students for sure know about it, but given this conversation, it’s probably not the majority.

As for the retake policy itself, the kids like it but opine that there should be an option for those who score above 85%. I hear them out. As we chat, they help me see that corrections can indeed work for 85%+ students. Our reasoning is that if you perform that well on an exam, you probably don’t have huge gaps in your understanding. Submitting corrected work with an analysis of your mistakes is sufficient to show that you’ve relearned the content (these students will receive 1/4 missed credit back don’t their grade). I agree to change the policy for semester two.

DeltaMath Day
We have less than 10 minutes remaining and I revisit something that was mentioned last week: using class time for DeltaMath. I share that I love this idea as a way to help everyone get some in-class practice. We coin it “DeltaMath Day” and discuss possible structures. Should students just come in and work? Can we have co-teachers (students who are finished) float around the room and help others? What about using stations? We don’t leave with answers to these questions, but do decide that DeltaMath Day should occur during the second half of each unit. It will lead up to the exam and serve as review.

Before we close, I reiterate the DeltaMath goal that we’ve started using in class. It was developed by the previous cohort of cogen students and want to ask if these students are on board with unveiling the final percentage to the class on Mondays. They’re good with this responsibility.

Remainders
I appreciate how a student’s disappointment about her grade triggered a collective deep dive into one of my grading policies today. By centering her experience, it afforded us the opportunity to interrogate my retake policy and help me see how poorly I was advocating for it, which eventually led us to revise it. The student who spoke up is one of the quietest students I teach and this fact only magnifies my appreciation for our dialogue. Without the cogen, would I have made space to act on her feedback? Would I have otherwise known about my blindspot? I hope she sees how valuable her comment was to me and other students.

As I remove the tablecloth and tuck away my snacks, my mind lingers back to the closing of the first semester and all of my struggling students. A few of them were present today at the cogen. Two of them are failing. If I’m not careful, this might discourage me from engaging with them at the cogen. Besides, they’re failing. Shouldn’t I be lecturing them on what they’re not doing, creating a plan of action for their individual success? Shouldn’t I be spending this time tutoring them?

Despite their struggle — and probably because of it — it’s vital that I stay proximate to these students and get their feedback. I need them close to me. Their experience in my class has been less than ideal and they can help me explore why. It’s through their eyes that I can find a way forward.

bp

Meditations on a Cogen (No. 12) • Thursday, January 13, 2022

During the 2021-22 school year, I’m having weekly co-generative dialogues (or cogens) with my students. In an effort to help me process these talks and document progress, I summarize and write reflections after each cogen. This is the 12th post in the series.

New faces, new energy
This week’s cogen brought new faces! As the 2nd cohort transitions out and the third transitions in, several members brought their successors with them today. In all, there were 8 students: 5 were veterans and 3 were newbies. As we settle in around the table, and I dump the snacks and water in the middle of it, fresh energy and a feeling of newness envelop us. The kids are laughing. There’s a lot of chatter. The mood is affable. It’s refreshing.

I open the cogen with introductions. Everyone goes around and says their name and grade. I explain the formal name of our space, write it on a nearby whiteboard and explain the term “cogen,” and then ask the veterans to share the purpose of our weekly dialogue. Just like the first time this happened back in November, it is pleasant hearing the students speak of the cogen from direct experience.

As the vets finish, I remember to hit record on my phone and drop it in the middle of the table to capture today’s audio. I hurriedly ask a non-cogen student who is in the room waiting for their friend to snap a few photos of us while we talk. She agrees and says that she’ll email them to me later. Before moving on, I give my two cents to further illuminate the what, why, when, and how of the cogen for the new students. I ask someone to take notes. We’re off and running.

Journal reflections
Eager to know how the math journal went, I ask them about it. How was writing it? What aspects did you like? What can be improved? I inform the group that the assignment was co-designed by me and the first cohort and that the next iteration of the assignment will be assigned in the coming weeks. The students’ feedback today will shape what it will look like. It’s worth noting that a couple of students at the cogen didn’t submit the journal. I assure them that this is not a place or time for me to indict them on their incomplete work. Rather, I want to learn from them, too. Is there something about the design or implementation of the assignment that might help them be more proactive next time?

After I serve up my questions and talking points, they return with several really good critiques and suggestions. I plan to use them all.

  • Add sentence starters to the assignment. I love this idea mainly because I recently saw an English teacher at my school do this for a writing assignment of hers. I underline it in my notes.
  • Make it due on Sunday. This way, the students get the weekend to work on it before it’s due. We recently adopted this approach with DeltaMath and someone notes how it helped her get more of it done.
  • Allot at least one day in class to work on the journal. This is good idea, which I should have thought of myself.
  • Use the cogen to determine the problems featured in the journal. This last recommendation is the most intriguing — at least from a cogen standpoint. I ask the students about the problems I included in the journal; they had to choose one to write about. A few students say the problems were fine, but I suspect that there’s more to uncover, so I probe further. After a few more of my questions, one student asks, “Mister, what if we chose the problems?” I immediately love this idea and nearly hug the student. My vision for her suggestion entails me presenting the cogen 10 problems and then us deciding which 5 end up in the final assignment. We agree that some of the problems should come from the in-class problem set.

Math bingo
Last week, after I asked the cogen to think of an assignment or class activity that they wanted to plan and enact, the students mentioned Math Bingo. So, after we finalize plans for the next journal, I show the group a Math Bingo activity that I found in my Dropbox archives. With some minor edits, it aligns well with the specifications we decided upon last week. The students glance through the handouts that detail the game and like what they see. I remind the crew that they will be co-teaching this activity with me. Next week, we’ll begin our study of complex numbers and the Bingo game — which is based on complex numbers — will take place late in the week, possibly Friday. We field a few logistical questions about gameplay and agree to touch base next week to finalize.

Ideas for Semester 2
A few minutes remain. With all the new members here today, I’m reminded that these students are going to help launch me and our class into the second semester. I decide to do some priming and ask them — I’m specifically looking at the new cogen students, but open it up to everyone — if they want to change anything about the class as we move into semester two.

Any time I ask far-reaching questions like this, I don’t usually get anything of substance from students. These types of queries — how I frame them, at least — are too vague and inexact of requests for students to get into particulars, which is want I want. This time, however, the students prove me wrong! They have two very specific proposals:

  • Given one day per unit to work on DeltaMath in class. I think this was bridged from our discussion about the journal. It is a great suggestion. I should allocate class time for what I value most, right? This is a major takeaway from today.
  • Use the start of class to relearn quiz content in a breakout group. The start of class usually looks the same for us (whole class dicussion). But why? This suggestion is aimed at helping only the students who stuggled with the previous day’s quiz. This means I could use the first 10 minutes of class to reteach these students in a small group while the rest of the class works on something different. We would reconvene as a class after.

Remainders
After the students leave, I stop my phone from recording and plop down at my desk to gather my thoughts on the last 30 minutes. I play two minutes of the audio, but know I won’t have time today to listen to it. Was I talking too much? Did I tap into 1 or 2 quieter students enough to ensure their voices and ideas were heard? The presence of the outgoing cogen students was so bright today. They were wonderful and engaged and unhesitant in their feedback. The demographics of the group stand out to me as well and I note how balanced they were. There was a nice mix of grade levels, genders, races, achievement levels, and special needs around the table today. I’m grateful for the perspective they offered me and to each other.

At this point, I’ve been alone in my room for 45 minutes. As I get up to leave, I remember that I’m still wearing my mask. I unhinge it from my ears and breathe deep. I smile warmly. My body and mind delight in the fact that, for the last 75 minutes, my cogen made me forget where I was. It transported me out of pandemic school year and into a normal one. We laughed, debated, and planned. There was no mention of Covid or remote learning. Both were banned from our dialogue and subtracted from our planning. At least for today, I feel far removed from reality.

I grab my things and leave satisfied.

bp