Why I’m #MfAProud

#MfAProud

Two years ago I drafted a post entitled “MfA and its Impact on My Career.” I knew at the time that I had a lot to say, but I could only compose one sentence, a thesis of sorts: MfA has spurred my professional growth and connection with like-minded educators. I revisited the draft many times since then with the hopes of publishing it, but never did. In fact, I wasn’t even able to add a second sentence, let alone complete a paragraph. Every time I wanted to, it seemed far too challenging to articulate what MfA meant to my career.

Fast forward to the present. With the start of a new school year, Math for America has outlined a campaign for its corps of teachers to share why they are proud to be a MfA teacher. Given this, the time is ripe for me to finish that initial draft and showcase my relationship with MfA. Besides, I’m long overdue.

I’ve hinted at this proclamation before; other than deciding to become a teacher, MfA is hands-down the best professional decision I’ve ever made.

For many teachers, including myself, MfA is a dream come true. Seriously, I’m still waiting to wake up. When you realize the woefully complex system in which we operate and contrast it with the die-hard passion for teaching that all MfA teachers possess, MfA is a breath of fresh air. I have met MfA teachers that have cried when discussing their relationship with Math for America. I can relate. Math for America changes careers in unforgettable ways.

When I think about it, MfA’s success doesn’t hinge on anything that’s all that extraordinary. They do something simple, really well: honor teachers. Period. Positively impacting teaching and learning in today’s cutthroat educational climate isn’t like brain surgery. MfA figured this out long ago…and it’s the root of my pride in being a Math for America teacher.

On the most fundamental level, they do this by providing community, structure, and a space where teachers can exchange ideas and resources, all the while feeling valued and trusted. MfA’s teacher-organized, teacher-designed, teacher-led workshops have transformed my classroom to a risk-taking laboratory. I’m constantly working with the best STEM educators in New York City and, I would argue, the country. In addition, I’ve been called on to lead colleagues like never before, which has helped me extend the arm, and mission, of MfA to empower my colleagues. I have also been fully funded to attend a conference. I have a paid membership to NCTM. And though nowhere near an expert, I have even been asked to speak at a research-based institute.

I’m also distinctly proud of the little ways I’ve been able to give back to MfA. To contribute to such an outstanding community (the gold standard in teacher development, if you ask me), means so much to me. Over the years, a certain responsibility has surfaced within me to help maintain the integrity of what MfA stands for and help it evolve over time. Best of all, I know that I still have so much more to give.

But, most of all, my pride shines every time I walk out of a MfA workshop at 7:30pm on a school night. During these moments, I am reminded that my job is a top priority, that I make all other professions possible. I am reminded that I am not an island unto myself. I am reminded why I never want to be an administrator. I am reminded that my students’ futures depend on my continuous development. I am reminded that I am a learner first, a teacher second.

I am reminded of why I am a teacher.

 

bp

Posted in reflection | Tagged | Leave a comment

Write me a letter

I need to improve how I get to know my students at the beginning of the school year.

I already knew that I was weak on this front, but when Sara VanDerWerf detailed launching tasks by creating context that honors students, it really inspired me to get the ball rolling.

I already have a couple of routines that allow me to connect with my students. Namely, personal notes, Friday letters, and end of year letters that I open at the start of the next school year. But what I’m missing is something substantial at the start of the year that will help me design the class around my students (that’s not content-based).

So this year, during the first week of school, I’m going to have students write me a letter. It can be handwritten or an email and serves as an opportunity for students to personally communicate whatever it is about themselves that they think I should know. I may provide prompts for those that need guidance, but I want the letter to be somewhat open-ended. I want them to tell me what they feel is important. Some prompts I’m thinking of are:

  • What’s something about yourself that I wouldn’t know by looking at you?
  • What’s your family’s background? Do you speak any languages other than English?
  • Who do you live with? Do you have any siblings?
  • In all of your years of school, who is/was your favorite teacher? Why?
  • Who is/was your least favorite? Why?
  • Was mathematics invented or discovered? Why do you think that? (Thanks Elizabeth.)
  • If you had to be any number, which one would you be? Why? (Thanks Matt.)

What’s more, over the course of the first few weeks of school, I’ll write every student a detailed letter in reply. This way they can get to know me on a more personal level as well. It’s a significant time committment, but one that I feel will be worth it in the long run.

Speaking of Sara, she also wrote about how she uses name tents during the first week of school, which I hope to adopt this year. This is a crafty, yet simple, way of not only learning student names, but also learning all that is behind those names.

 

bp

Posted in activity, reflection | Tagged | Leave a comment

End behavior of functions via Connecting Representations

As the second and final assignment for the Structured Inquiry course I’m taking with New Visions, I was asked to create a task using the Connection Representations instructional routine (#ConnectingReps). More on Instrutional Routines here.

The instructor, Kaitlin Ruggiero, mentioned that multiple choice questions are good starting points for developing these tasks. Adopting her suggestion, I used #4 from the June 2016 Algebra 2 Regents Exam. The question focuses on roots and end behavior of a function. (F.IF.8). I chose to narrow my focus to strictly end behavior.

Here are the first set of representations, graphs of several polynomial functions:

Here are the second set of representations, statements about the end behavior of each graph:

During rehearsal, I showed graphs A, B, and D and their corresponding end behavior statements. We followed the routine to match the representations. I then revealed graph C and had them come up with the statement, which is 4. Lastly, the class reflected on what they learned using meta-reflection prompts.

I don’t have a formal write-up of the activity, but here are the above images.

Reflections:

  • I designed this for my algebra 2 class. My gut is telling me that it may fit in well at the beginning of my rational and polynomial functions unit. I may also consider using it if/when we review domain and range.
  • Initial noticings about the graphs had more to do with the “inner behavior” rather than the end behavior. In other words, the class was drawn to the minima, maxima, and roots.
  • There was some blank stares when I revealed the statements. This will most likely happen with students, too. The mapping symbol (i.e. function arrow) can be confusing if you’ve never seen it before. But that was the point.
  • Most of the class chunked all of the “x approaches…” statements and realized that they were the same in each representation. Since two of the given graphs (A and B) had both ends going to either positive or negative infinity and the other graph (D) didn’t, this led them to conclude that graph D had to match with statement 2. From there they reasoned that since graph A is going up on both ends, it should match with statement 1. Similar reasoning was used to match graph C with statement 4.
  • By giving the class three graphs and three statements, the third match (C and 4) was kind of boring. I still made them justify why C and 4 matched, but it didn’t feel as meaningful.
  • In retrospect, I wouldn’t change any of the representations, but I would revise what I give the class and what I have them construct on their own in order to help them move between representations more fluidly:
    • Give only A and B and their matching statements (1 and 3). Students reason through the matches.
    • Then give graph C and have them construct the corresponding statement (which is statement 4).
    • As an extension, I would give statement 2 and have them sketch a graph that goes with it. All student graphs will be similar to graph D, but the “inner behavior” will be all over the place. Because of the infinite number of possible correct responses, we could show several graphs under the Elmo to guide this part of the routine. I could save these student-generated graphs for later analysis on other properties, including even/odd, roots, maxima/minima, etc.
  • I didn’t use the words chunk, change, or connect at any point during the rehearsal. This is somewhat disappointing since I want my students to use these terms to describe their reasoning during this routine. Mental note taken.
  • Instead of me selecting the next presenter, sometimes I should allow the student that just presented to choose. This is student-centric and I like it (when appropriate).
  • Compared to Contemplate then Calculate, I feel that Connecting Representations is a slightly more complex in nature. With that said, Connecting Representations uses matching, which is really user-friendly. Both routines emphasize mathematical structure, but it seems to me like Connecting Representations emphasizes structure between different representations while Contemplate then Calculate focuses on structure within a representation. Dylan Kane and Nicole Hansen hinted at this during TMC16.
  • Though I didn’t use Connecting Representations, this past spring I foreshadowed this work with my Sigma notation lesson. Given two representations (sigma notation and its expanded sum), students used reasoning to connect the two.
  • This in-depth experience with both of these routines will allow my students to surface and leverage mathematical structure through inquiry like never before. So exciting!

 

bp

 

 

Posted in lesson, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Mental Math

pay-1036470_960_720

Continuing the process of letting some ideas breath on the blog this summer. Here’s another.

It’s a simple activity for those few unexpected extra minutes near the end of the period…or if I just want to hit them with some quick mental stimulation. I picked it up from my fourth grade teacher: mental math.

I simply call out a sequence of operations with a pause between each operation. For example, I might say “2 plus 5 (pause)…times 8 (pause)…minus 10 (pause)…divided 13…what’s the answer?

Students can’t allowed to say anything out loud and, obviously, any electronic device is prohibited. I don’t require that everyone plays (most do). The students must wait until I say ‘What’s the answer?’ before raising their hands. I call on a different student each time and if that person’s answer is wrong, someone else gets a chance. Because it’s a terribly simple idea, it’s always engaging. The trick is to make it challenging to the point where they get hooked and want more.

Some tidbits: I’ll usually start with one that’s pretty straightforward with long pauses – especially at the beginning of the year. Things get interesting when I start to call out the operations lightning fast or the sequence contains something like 15 operations. Make things fun by using numbers in the millions – or even billions. Also, depending on the class, the level of the math can vary from basic arithmetic to roots and exponents to evaluating trig functions. It’s endless. And fun.

Posted in activity | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TMC16 Reflections

IMG_0070_1

Twitter Math Camp 2016 has officially come and gone. Its impact will be felt for years to come.

This is the type professional development that stays with you. Some of the best minds in mathematics education from all over the world come together and, for three four and a half days, form a mosaic that’s impossible to duplicate. And at the center of it all is a deep-rooted passion for mathematics, pedagogy, and improvement. What happens at TMC changes careers.

This year was no different.

The keynotes by Sara, Jose, Tracy, and Dylan set the tone. Their themes of evangelism, social justice, K-16 collaboration, and deliberate practice all struck chords because they are all things that I’ve been thinking about lately. I found myself constantly referring back to them throughout the conference.

The morning sessions provided a calm, relaxing space to reflect deeply on a specific aspect of my practice: questioning. I rediscovered the power that a question holds – especially when it comes from your student.

The My Favorite and afternoon sessions added some valuable new tools to my toolbox. I am now fully equipped to jump off some cliffs take plenty of risks next year.

I can’t go a word further without thanking Math for America for supporting my TMC16 journey through their Impact Grant. Once again, they have demonstrated why they are the best thing to ever happen to my teaching career.

Everything below is not intended to be summary of TMC16. Instead, it is a collection of personal discoveries and relationships that I made over the course of those four and a half wonderful days in Minneapolis, Minnesota. There are many.

 

Day 0 (Desmos Preconference) – Friday, July 15, 2016


  • Damn. Dan Meyer is tall.
  • The collaboration document containing all pertinent links.
  • Desmos is now accessible for visually impaired users. This is huge. Desmos understands that as teachers and students become more and more dependent on their product, the calculator needs higher levels of accessibility to avoid disappointing the masses. Kudos to them for continually aiming to please their users.
  • I don’t sit and play with Desmos enough. This day gave me the opportunity to muck around via the scavenger hunt. Two standouts: learning how to use lists and regressions with draggable points. Good stuff.
  • Sara Vanderwerf challenged us all to be evangelists. This was pure inspiration. She’s all passion…one of those educators that I aspire to be. Takeaways: a) find your evangelical goal, b) read The Art of Evangelism by Guy Kawasaki, c) have students use the Desmos app in class (a lot) – especially at the beginning of the year…equity and access, and d) minimize visual noise in the classroom (read more about her math wall of shame). Notes.
  • I met Abby Rosa, who teaches at a correctional facility. This rocked my world. I had so many questions for her.
  • I chatted with Paul Kelley who is on the board of directors at NCTM. Pretty cool.
  • We can now create marbleslides and card sorts ourselves in Desmos. The collective uproar on this was deafening. I tinkered and created a card sort on relations.
  • Desmos socks. Finally.

 

Day 1 – Saturday, July 16, 2016


  • Started off by scouring the area for a decent breakfast spot. I hate hotels without complimentary morning grub. It’s a crime.
  • I chose my morning session because I’ll be facilitating a book club in the fall with Math for America and wanted to get my feet wet. The group only consists of four of us. Norma Gordon is the facilitator. The focus of the day was A More Beautiful Question by Warren Berger, which I have read before. We spent 45 minutes reading the book followed by discourse around inquiry and why it’s so vital to student achievement. Takeaways: Get students to ask the questions, ask students questions that Google can’t answer, that students are the “research and development division” of the human species, game-changing ideas stem from a cycle of What?, What if?, and Why? questions, and teaching inquiry through experience and not merely because the teacher says to. Notes.
  • I spent the majority of lunch with Tina Cardone, who is also part of the book club morning sessions. I’ve known of her for a long time, so getting the opportunity to have an extended conversation and get to know her better was a real treat. We talked about our schools, why we teach where we do, the transparency that’s needed with students with special needs, and our mutual love for root beer. She even introduced me to Pokemon!
  • My Favorites. Jonathan Claydon’s Varisty Math is outstanding. He’s turned learning mathematics into a brand. And he’s marketing it. Next year, I’d love to start off with stickers/patches and possibly lead up t-shirts at some point. Brilliant stuff here from Jonathan. Also, I should read into Ms. Pacman transformations from Robert Kaplinsky and other teachers that have used it. Notes.
  • Jose Vilson‘s keynote was full of candid talk (video). After my recent post of my own inspired by his book, I was excited to hear him speak. He message was clear: I need you. His call to the whole of MTBoS was direct. We need to place more of a focus on social justice and equity for the students that need it most. We need to go beyond mathematics. No matter where we teach, your students are my students and mine are yours. He fielded questions and challenged us all to deliberately seek to address issues of race and social class. Notes.
  • Next up was the Talking Points session with Elizabeth Statmore. I think she’s my new hero. Backed by research, she demonstrated why quality exploratory talk amongst students is the number one predictor of effective group work. This is especially pertinent to me because of my goals for group work. Talking Points are a simple way to promote flexible thinking, vulnerability, and listening. Here are some examples. I also loved Reader’s Theatre…it is a fun way to introduce it (or any other structure) in a way that is friendly and inviting. Maybe I should read the book this summer? Also, Glen Waddell mentioned Open Middle problems, which I had never heard of. Notes.
  • Julie Wright closed the day with her talk on using feedback quizzes to promote low-stakes learning. She described her system of providing detailed, written, unscored assessments. I pondered this idea of (efficient) feedback last year. It involves scanning students exams as a single PDF, inserting typed feedback (no scores), and handing them back to students for revision. Feedback is colored-coded for the teacher, but students only see black. All students receive equal amounts of feedback. Notes.

 

Day 2 – Sunday, July 17, 2016


  • Cereal in my room. A solid decision.
  • My favorites. David Sabol, a Clevelander (!), used some pretty cool data to illustrate his usage of maps and voronoi diagrams to promote engagement, modeling, and low-floor, high-ceiling mathematics. Anna Blinstein highlighted her commitment to flipped assessment (feedback meetings) with students, which really interested me because I considered (private) the same thing last February. She wants to maximize the time spends on feedback and conferencing with individual, pairs, or triads of students is her way of doing this. I see value here and want to pick her brain more about her system. Notes.
  • Day 2 of the book club kicked off with an hour of reading A More Beautiful Question followed by using the Interview Design and Dialog protocol. I felt good about the protocol. Takeaways from the day’s reading: how student-generated questions from underserved youth can evoke social justice, why the “professionalism” of asking questions serves to maintain the status quo of those in authority, and the potential impact of a “Be a Skeptic” theme for my classroom next year. Notes.
  • I spent lunch getting to know Sandy Ketterling, a.k.a. the queen of baking. She teaches on an Indian reservation. Sweet lady. Go warriors!
  • My favorites. Sam Shah again amazed me with his work on explore-math.weebly.com. Connie Haugneland made my weekend by sharing her uplifting story about sponsoring a student and building a school in Rwanda. Her experiences have inspired her to move to Rwanda and dive even deeper into this work. Connie, thank you for embracing a cause that many of us distance ourselves from. Notes.
  • I caught up with Andy Pethan. A cool dude. Down-to-earth. Relatable. Smart. Shame there was no frisbee this go around.
  • In her keynote, Tracy Zager did a lot to open up the collaboration pathways between elementary and secondary mathematics teachers (video). Her passion called on us to do a better job of bridging the divide that exists between us. Interestingly, I’ve recently given thought to this. We have so much to learn from one another and she provided several examples of mathematical pedagogy that prove that we are stronger together. When we make our learning and vulnerabilities public, amazing things happen. Let’s be intentional and move beyond the self-imposed boundaries we call grade levels. And please, don’t call elementary mathematics the “basics.” Notes.
  • Dylan Kane and Nicole Hansen supplemented the New Visions course I’m taking this summer by exploring mathematical structure, Mathematical Practice Standard 7. I’ve long admired Dylan as a humble, well-articulated, knowledgable source on teaching and Nicole proved likewise. Through this session I realized the need for a routine (ahem…New Visions) to surface structure for kids and help them to leverage it. The shift from procedural to structural thinking has caused me to rethink so much of mathematics and how I teach it. The goal is getting kids thinking flexibly using structure within a problem and between problems. I feel the earth moving on this one. Oh yeah. Big improvements on the way. Notes.
  • The day wrapped up with Jonathan Claydon and his unorthodox approach of implementing curriculum. He is so damn inspiring. Last week, by happenstance, I stumbled upon his post that motivated the session, so I had a pretty good idea what was on tap. He shared how and why he decided to hack the traditional curriculum to pieces. His centers his planning on skills rather than content. This allows for more continuity throughout the year and less disjointed learning. It’s a really interesting structure that I’m looking to adopt. The inception button and marble races were also outstanding takeaways. Notes.

 

Day 3 – Monday, July 18, 2016


  • A breakfast disappointment. Although, there was fresh fruit was involved – so it wasn’t a total meltdown.
  • My favorites. Joel Bezaire discussed an incredibly simple game that he uses with his students. I want to try this. It’s straightforward, but can get deceptively challenging. Sort of reminds of a Sudoku or KenKen. He has a website dedicated to the game and an archive of versions he’s already created. Gregory Taylor blew everyone away with his math song about the cubic formula based on a hymn from Sister Act. And Edmund Harris delighted us all by revealing that his new coloring book, Visions of the Universe, will debut on November 29, 2016. To ice the cake, there will be four lesson plans written by MTBoS teachers (Sam is one) that will align with the two coloring books. Notes.
  • The final day of the book club opened up with an informal discussion about protocols that digressed into teaching strategies. Tina showed us a “step-by-step” activity similar to this one, but in her case students fold the paper backwards to hide all previous work before passing it left or right. I feel desk surfaces are underutilized spaces, and Norma made a great point that whatever is attached shouldn’t be static because, over time, students will simply ignore it. Shop ticket holders were brought up as a possible solution. Takeaways from the day’s reading/discussion: stay away from answers – live in the questions, we must stop doing and knowing in order to ask, we know far less than our intuition leads us to believe, ask why five times, and Tina’s idea of having a reflection question based on the day of the week (e.g. Tuesday: What’s one good thing that happened to you in the past week?). A possible MTBoS book exchange was also brought up, which I love. Notes.
  • My Favorites. Denis Sheeran discussed his initiative I See Math, which encourages us to step back, simplify our approach, let student misconceptions come forward, and frame real-world situations with mathematics. It’s a structure consisting of three slides: title, image, and question. He also showed us two cool games to play with Google Maps: Geoguessr (old) and SmartyPins (new), both of which are really fun. Notes.
  • Dylan Kane was the last keynote of the conference. Dylan detailed his first few years teaching by admitting that he tirelessly searched for and tried out so many resources he found through MTBoS. What he learned was that despite being extremely dedicated to improvement, he wasn’t deliberate. He constantly referenced the elements of deliberate practice as outlined in Peak by Anders Ericsson and Robert Pool (a superb book): getting out of your comfort zone, being specific, including feedback, and being goal-oriented. His inspiration seems to stem from asking the question, “What would MTBoS do?” when stuck between a rock and a hard place. He mentioned that we can meaningfully improve our practice by about 10% each year. Call to action: How will I distribute that 10% and how will I be more purposeful about it? Notes.
  • I missed out on the Assessing What We Value (Experience-First Mathematics) afternoon session. I want to read up on this.
  • The awesome Alex Overwijk was up next with Go With the Flow. His speciality is accomplishing flow in the classroom and references the work of Peter Liljedahl with vertical non-permanent surfaces (VNPS) and visible random groupings (VRG) to accomplish this. He recommended the book Flow by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi and an article by Peter. He proceeded to demo the strategy with the taxman problem which left me in awe. Critical note: The brilliance behind this strategy goes far beyond using vertical whiteboards. The majority of the impact lies in how one facilitates student work and keeps them in an optimal state of engagement. He challenged us to give students less and allow learning to happen naturally. Now I know what all the hype is about with VNPS. At some point, I must try this next year. Notes.
  • Minnesota-based teacher Annie Perkins brought folks together in her flex session to talk about how she introduces students to mathematicians that look more like them in terms of ethnicity, LGBT, etc. Here is an example. It’s a form of social justice that she calls “The Mathematicians Project.” She uses Wikipedia to research mathematicians and dedicates 5-10 minutes each Friday to present one mathematician to her students. She polls her students to determine who to present. The impact on her students has been remarkable. She is looking to post all the mathematicians she presents in her classroom and even see if she can get some living ones to pay a visit to her students. The close of the session included a discussion about how to advance social justice within our classrooms and the MTBoS. The hashtag #sjmath was mentioned and Radical Math was shared for mathematics-based, social justice-themed resources. Sheila Orr and Wendy Menard are also great ambassadors of this work.  Notes.

 

Day 4 – Tuesday, July 19, 2016


  • I ate the hotel breakfast!
  • My favorites. Amy Zimmer shared a really cool ice breaker that focuses on the collective interests of the members of the group. What stood out to me was how she highlights the process the groups use arrive at their choices. This turns into a great class discussion about group chemistry and teamwork. Max shared his a congruent triangles example of his work on ARCs, each of which consist of NCTM resources pieced together in single coherent resource. He’s going to share those with me, which I’d like to play around with. Glenn Waddell received a standing ovation for sharing how he has faced his fears…and how it has completely changed his life (video). Megan testified on how a boring moment at a PD can lead to presenting at a State Fair with the likes of Christopher Danielson. I appreciate her humility. And what an interesting exploration she developed! Hannah Mesick gave me a really good idea about displaying birthdays as functions (video). So intuitive. Notes.

 

bp

Posted in reflection, resources | Tagged , | 6 Comments